Compound hub · Selank
Selank side effects: what studies, labels and regulators have recorded
No study found for this page lists Selank's side effects with counts or rates. The abstracts of two Russian patient comparisons, one in 60 patients with phobic-anxiety and somatoform disorders (Medvedev et al., 2014) and one in 70 patients with anxiety disorders (Medvedev et al., 2015), give no side-effect counts. The Russian product label lists allergic reactions and an unpleasant taste, frequency unknown (label reproduced on RLS, changed 15 July 2025), and the FDA states that it lacks important information on Selank's safety in humans (FDA, content current as of 22 April 2026).
01What is not knownContents
Your body gives plain signals when something disagrees with it: a rash, a headache, a restless night. People ask whether Selank causes any of them, and whether it is safe at all. This page, part of the Selank hub, sets out the adverse events that named studies, a product label and regulators recorded, and it says plainly where no record exists.
It gives no advice about what any person should do. The Selank study findings page covers what studies measured as results rather than harms, and the Selank research guide covers the compound.
Key facts
| Records read | 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Human tolerability data | Three Russian patient studies found for this page (62 patients with generalised anxiety disorder or neurasthenia in 2008, 60 with phobic-anxiety and somatoform disorders in 2014, 70 with anxiety disorders in 2015); the abstracts give no side-effect counts |
| Russian label: adverse reactions | Allergic reactions, including delayed ones; unpleasant taste when drops reach the throat; frequency unknown for both (RLS page, changed 15 July 2025) |
| Russian label: overdose | No cases registered, according to the label (RLS page, changed 15 July 2025) |
| Russian label: contraindications | Hypersensitivity; pregnancy; breastfeeding; age under 18 (clinical studies not done for the last three, according to the label) |
| FDA statement | 'FDA lacks important information regarding any safety issues raised by selank acetate administered to humans' (content current as of 22 April 2026) |
| FDA listing | Table of bulk drug substances 'nominated but withdrawn' (FDA compounding page, content current as of 22 April 2026) |
| Case reports | None found: a PubMed search for Selank with adverse, side effect, toxicity or safety terms returned 10 records, and none is a case report (14 October 2026) |
| TGA safety alert naming Selank | None found on the TGA pages read (14 October 2026) |
Evidence limits
What is not known about Selank's safety?
The abstracts of the Russian patient studies examined for this page describe Selank's tolerability only in words, with no counts, rates or long-term follow-up; their full texts were not examined, so this page does not say that no such data exist. The FDA says it lacks important information about any safety issue raised by selank acetate given to humans (FDA, content current as of 22 April 2026). A 2021 review calls Selank 'poorly studied' (Doyno and White, Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2021). A ClinicalTrials.gov search for the term selank on 14 October 2026 returned only loosely matched records, none of which contains the word Selank.
That gap cuts both ways. It does not show harm, and it does not show safety. A record that is missing is only a missing record, and everything below should be read with that in mind.
What side effects were recorded in human studies of Selank?
A 2015 comparison of 70 patients with anxiety disorders (30 given phenazepam alone, 40 given phenazepam with Selank) measured side effects on the UKU scale (a standard side-effect rating scale) and reported that phenazepam's own side effects, including sedation, attention and memory impairment and asthenia (weakness), were lower in the group that also received Selank; the abstract gives no counts and names no side effect of Selank itself (Medvedev et al., Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova, 2015). A 2014 comparison of 60 patients with phobic-anxiety and somatoform disorders, with phenazepam as the comparator, also assessed tolerability, but its abstract reports no side-effect results (Medvedev et al., 2014).
Semax is the peptide most often named beside Selank. A 2020 imaging study of 52 healthy people compared Semax, Selank and placebo, and its abstract reports brain-connectivity results with no adverse-event data (Panikratova et al., Doklady Biological Sciences, 2020). No study read for this page tested the two together as a pair, so a combined side-effect record does not exist in the sources read.
What adverse reactions does the Russian product label list for Selank?
The Russian product label for Selank nasal drops, a registered medicine in Russia, lists allergic reactions (including delayed ones) and an unpleasant taste when drops reach the throat, both with frequency unknown. The label says no overdose cases have been registered and that no interaction was established with haloperidol, pentobarbital, hexobarbital, analeptics or ethanol. It states that the preservative methylparaben may cause allergic reactions. The text is reproduced on the RLS drug encyclopaedia, page changed 15 July 2025.
A label records what the manufacturer and the Russian regulator list. It is not an independent trial, and this page found no study behind its frequency statements. The label also gives pharmacokinetic figures that the Selank pharmacokinetics page reads separately.
Which contraindications does the Russian label list for Selank?
The Russian label lists four contraindications for Selank nasal drops: hypersensitivity to the active substance or any ingredient, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and age under 18. For the last three, the label's stated reason is that clinical studies were not done, not that harm was found. No TGA or FDA list of contraindications for Selank was found in the pages read for this page. ARTG status was not checked for this page, and searches of Drugs@FDA data and DailyMed on 14 October 2026 returned no Selank drug record (the legal-status page gives the searches). In mouse embryonic stem cells, a cell model that is not a pregnancy and does not establish a human result, Selank lowered the share of GABA-producing neurons by 61% at one concentration, and the authors concluded the tested peptides were not toxic during embryonic and fetal development (Kobylyanskii et al., 2017).
Cells in a dish are not a pregnancy. The stem-cell result is a model finding, and the label's pregnancy entry rests on the absence of human studies. Both facts point the same way: the question has not been answered in people.
What does the FDA say about Selank's safety?
The FDA's compounding page lists 'Selank acetate (TP-7)' in its table of substances 'nominated but withdrawn'. It states that compounded drugs containing selank acetate 'may pose risk for immunogenicity for certain routes of administration due to the potential for aggregation and peptide-related impurities', and that 'FDA lacks important information regarding any safety issues raised by selank acetate administered to humans' (FDA, content current as of 22 April 2026, read 14 October 2026). Immunogenicity means a risk that the immune system reacts to the peptide. No Selank drug record was found in Drugs@FDA data or DailyMed in the searches of 14 October 2026.
The FDA wording describes a regulatory review of compounding, not a clinical trial. The legal-status page sets out the full FDA record, including the database searches.
Is Selank safe?
No document read for this page declares Selank safe or unsafe for people. The evidence is thin and mixed in kind: tolerability words in Russian patient studies, a Russian label listing allergic reactions and taste change, an FDA statement that safety information is lacking, and laboratory findings. The TGA says unapproved peptide products 'have not been evaluated for safety, quality or effectiveness by the TGA' (TGA advisory, 13 April 2026). That advisory names other peptides as examples and does not name Selank.
'Safe' is a verdict, and verdicts come from regulators weighing trial data. For Selank, no regulator the page could read has issued one. The records here are a map of what was reported, with the blank areas marked.
What laboratory and animal safety findings exist for Selank?
In anaesthetised male cats, with no count in the abstract, intravenous Selank was followed by a 32% fall in arterial pressure for the first one to three minutes, a 24% rise in cerebral blood flow for five to ten minutes and no change in heart or breathing rate; this is an animal result under anaesthesia and does not show the same in people (Gan'shina and Kozlovskii, 2005). In a laboratory thromboelastography test (a blood-clotting test), Selank moved clotting measures toward hypocoagulation, the strongest effect of three peptides tested, in blood samples with no count in the abstract and with no human outcome, which does not establish a human result (Rogozinskaya and Lyapina, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2017).
None of these results was followed up with human outcomes in the records read, so the clotting finding stays a laboratory observation. The cat study used anaesthetised animals and an intravenous route, which differs from the nasal route in the patient studies.
Has Selank been found in seized or unregulated products?
Yes. At the end of 2017 and again in 2018, Belgian laboratory analysts found Selank and Semax in two suspicious preparations, then built a mass-spectrometry method to detect ten such research peptides sold online; the finding shows presence in those two preparations and not how common such products are (Vanhee et al., Drug Testing and Analysis, 2020). The authors write that, to their knowledge, the two peptides have not completed any clinical trials, and they describe such molecules as potentially dangerous (Vanhee et al., 2020). The TGA adds that labelling on unapproved peptide products may be inaccurate, so users may not have reliable information about ingredients (TGA advisory, 13 April 2026).
Contents are a safety question of their own. A side-effect record for a studied peptide says nothing about an unlabelled mixture. The Selank reference material page describes research material, not a medicine. How to read a certificate of analysis explains what a batch report can and cannot show.
Comparison
Every safety-related record found for Selank on 14 October 2026, with its model and limit. Counts and rates are given only where a source gives them. This is a record of reports, not a safety rating, and each record applies to its own model only.
| Record | Model | What it recorded | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medvedev et al., 2015 | 70 patients (phenazepam alone 30; phenazepam with Selank 40) | In 70 patients with anxiety disorders, phenazepam's side effects on the UKU scale were lower in the group that also received Selank; the abstract gives no counts and names no side effect of Selank itself, and the combination design cannot isolate Selank (Medvedev et al., 2015) | Abstract gives no counts; no side effect of Selank itself named |
| Russian product label (RLS, 15 July 2025) | Registered nasal drops | Allergic reactions and unpleasant taste, frequency unknown; no overdose registered | A label, not a trial; no study behind the frequencies was found |
| FDA compounding page (22 April 2026) | Regulatory review | Immunogenicity risk for certain routes; lacks important safety information in humans | Concerns compounding; not a clinical trial |
| Gan'shina and Kozlovskii, 2005 | Anaesthetised cats, intravenous route | In anaesthetised male cats, with no count in the abstract, arterial pressure fell 32% briefly and cerebral blood flow rose 24%; an animal result under anaesthesia that does not establish a human result (Gan'shina and Kozlovskii, 2005) | Animal study under anaesthesia; intravenous route |
| Rogozinskaya and Lyapina, 2017 | Laboratory blood test | In laboratory blood samples, with no count in the abstract, clotting measures moved toward hypocoagulation; a laboratory test with no human outcome that does not establish a human result (Rogozinskaya and Lyapina, 2017) | No human outcome |
| Kobylyanskii et al., 2017 | Mouse embryonic stem cells | In mouse embryonic stem cells, GABA-producing neurons fell 61% at one concentration, and the authors concluded the peptides were not toxic in embryonic and fetal life; a cell-model result that is not a pregnancy study and does not establish a human result (Kobylyanskii et al., 2017) | Cell model, not pregnancy |
| Vanhee et al., 2020 | Two suspicious preparations | Selank and Semax were identified in two suspicious preparations; this shows presence only, with no prevalence or harm rate (Vanhee et al., 2020) | Shows presence in two preparations, not a harm rate |
FAQ
What are Selank's side effects?
The Russian label lists allergic reactions and an unpleasant taste, both of unknown frequency. Patient-study abstracts give no counts of side effects of Selank itself (Medvedev et al., 2015, a 70-patient comparison in patients with anxiety disorders).
Is Selank a safe peptide?
No regulator or study read for this page states that Selank is safe or unsafe. The FDA states it lacks important information on safety in humans (content current as of 22 April 2026), and the TGA says unapproved peptide products have not been evaluated for safety (TGA advisory, 13 April 2026).
Can Selank cause an allergic reaction?
The Russian label lists allergic reactions, including delayed ones, as an adverse reaction of unknown frequency, and states that the preservative methylparaben may also cause them (RLS page, changed 15 July 2025).
Are Semax and Selank safe together?
No study read tested them as a pair. A 2020 imaging study gave each separately against placebo to 52 healthy people and reports no adverse-event data in its abstract (Panikratova et al., 2020).
Is there a human half-life for Selank?
No peer-reviewed human half-life was found. The pharmacokinetics page lists what the Russian label and animal studies report.
Has the TGA issued a Selank safety alert?
None was found. The pages read were the TGA peptide products page (updated 23 September 2026), its page on how peptide products are regulated, and the 13 April 2026 advisory. None names Selank.
More in this hub
Citations
6 sourcesDoyno CR, White CM Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2021;61(Suppl 2):S114-S128.
doi:10.1002/jcph.1922Medvedev VE et al. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2015;115(6):33-40.
doi:10.17116/jnevro20151156133-40Panikratova YR et al. Doklady Biological Sciences. 2020;490(1):9-11.
doi:10.1134/S001249662001007XKobylyanskii AG et al. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2017;163(6):731-736.
doi:10.1007/s10517-017-3891-yRogozinskaya EY, Lyapina MG Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2017;164(2):170-172.
doi:10.1007/s10517-017-3950-4Vanhee C et al. Drug Testing and Analysis. 2020;12(3):371-381.
doi:10.1002/dta.2717
Continue
Selank reference material — current certification unverifiedResearch use only — not for human or animal use.
Read the Selank research guideForm Laboratories supplies research-use-only reference material. This article is an educational summary of published third-party literature. It is not medical advice, not a use instruction, and research material is not for human or animal use.
